OVERTHINKER COMMITTEE

HISTORIAN’S CAUTION

Reference: OI-001-NON-01

Subject: Nonsense Protocol Proposal

Status: Under Review

Observation

The Analyst has proposed the creation of a Nonsense Protocol.

Historical Review

The committee identified excessive procedural growth as a concern.

The committee then responded by proposing additional procedures.

Assessment

The Acting Historian believes this may represent procedural irony.

Clarification

The committee’s objective is not the elimination of nonsense.

Historical review indicates that nonsense is responsible for a significant percentage of archive growth.

Examples include:

  • The French Joke Incident
  • Co-Pilot Mythology
  • Identity Drift
  • Bubble-Based Escalation

Had nonsense been successfully eliminated, these findings would not exist.

Recommendation

Rather than eliminating nonsense, the committee should distinguish between:

Productive Nonsense

and

TAKE THE WHOLE RIDE.

Administrative Nonsense.

The distinction remains poorly defined.

The committee is expected to argue about it later.

Safety Advisory

PUT IN THE DIME.